KSK8
561 posts
msg #147134
- Ignore KSK8 |
3/29/2019 4:06:53 PM
olathegolf,
You are forgetting something vital. It's Shills's toxic behavior which caused one of the biggest contributors of this website to depart. Everyone with a brain knows this. He pretends to be rich and elegant when he devotes 16 hours a day every day on an online forums making call-outs with modified next to them.
That will be the last I say on this thread about him going forward. Since this is indeed your thread I will refrain from deviating the topic in the future.
On the nicer side of things, the portfolio today reached a 92% net gain with only 8 trades. I'd like to see someone top THAT.
|
olathegolf
119 posts
msg #147135
- Ignore olathegolf |
3/29/2019 5:13:04 PM
KSK8, thanks for your contribution to this forum. I don't think you instigated the exchange. I am just reminded about someone like Kevin who left and many have missed his contrubutions.
|
shillllihs
6,102 posts
msg #147136
- Ignore shillllihs |
3/29/2019 6:07:24 PM
This guy is a fraud. The fact that you miss Kevin so much proves you're not capable financially and able to find the shares availabile to trade it. And you lack the guts.
You would double your money every two weeks and you would own half the world and you would not be needing to cry for help from Kevin, whom by the way was long XIV when he left, before tanking 95%
But anyway, fun stuff.
|
olathegolf
119 posts
msg #147137
- Ignore olathegolf |
3/29/2019 6:14:46 PM
Poor shilllihs. You always show your true colors.
|
nibor100
1,103 posts
msg #147139
- Ignore nibor100 |
3/29/2019 6:31:44 PM
@ksk8,
As part of your earlier shorting threads you had a rule about not shorting a stock that had a reverse split within the last 8 months, if I remember correctl; but a couple of your recent picks have had reverse splits within that window of time.
Are reverse splits not a concern for this new shorting approach?
Thanks,
Ed S.
|
KSK8
561 posts
msg #147140
- Ignore KSK8 |
3/29/2019 7:09:42 PM
nibor100,
You are correct about what I said regarding reverse splits, but with my personal method of trading now-a-days I find them to be a useful component considering reverse splits are harmful to the stock; primarily because of the dilution prospect. But they still present a danger. Check the sec filings for the company to find about the reason there was even a reverse split. It is imperative to understand why it happened before deciding to go short. I can go into more detail about this.
|
graftonian
1,089 posts
msg #147142
- Ignore graftonian |
3/29/2019 8:08:16 PM
Olathegolf, I'm outa here
Graf
|
Village Elder
231 posts
msg #147169
- Ignore Village Elder |
4/1/2019 6:13:20 PM
KSK8:
Nice trading so far. You can't argue with your success, although I do wish that you actually traded these and posted your entry, exit, and commission costs to see how it really plays out rather than as a paper exercise.
Nonetheless, as I have said before I respect those folks here who post their trades before or as they are being made. Good luck on PULM.
|
KSK8
561 posts
msg #147170
- Ignore KSK8 |
4/1/2019 8:37:03 PM
I do live trade these and they play out relatively adjacent to what I post. I get filled near the open and I cover at the price I report. As for commissions, read the first part of my thread.
My live trading is not the point though. The prospect of my thread is to display the success of my trading system by tracking its performance. No other thread on this forums has shown it has the capability of outperforming what I call-out. Hence why the title is "The Most Profitable Thread on Stockfetcher".
As for PULM, it'll go in my favor, just watch.
GLTY!
|
olathegolf
119 posts
msg #147171
- Ignore olathegolf |
4/1/2019 10:00:00 PM
Good luck with PULM
Volume = 58M
RSI2 = 98.59
ROC1,1 = 81.89
|